I turned down every VC check for 12 years to keep 92% ownership of Groove.
It has proven to be the best decision of my life.
Here’s the math:
While VCs are pushing founders to split ownership down to 5% chasing unicorn dreams, independent founders are quietly building $5M ARR businesses they own 92%+ of.
I’ve seen both sides. And here’s the math nobody talks about...
The VC Path:
- Give up 95% ownership
- Split decision making
- Lose control of vision
- Raise endless rounds
- Hope for unicorn exit
- Maybe get $50M
- If you’re lucky (<1% chance)
The Independence Path:
- Build with customer money
- Keep 92% ownership
- Run profitable (50% EBITDA)
- $5M ARR
- $2.5M/year in your pocket
- Complete control always there
- Freedom to choose direction
Thesis: The simple math of a $5M boostrapped ARR beats the promised story of a unicorn exit. The reason?
- it’s achievable (many have done it)
- it’s profitable (50% EBITDA)
- it’s yours (no board approval)
- it gives options: - work your way or their way - sell for $30M or scale to $100M - take profits or reinvest everything
We’ve built Groove this way:
- clear focus: sustainable SaaS $5M-$10M ARR
- real moats: ownership, profit, control
- actual freedom: every decision is ours
VCs sell you unicorn dreams. But bootstrappers are building generational wealth.
The real win isn’t a unicorn exit.
It’s complete freedom with generational wealth.
That’s why 92% ownership is the new standard.
Let VCs chase their 1% dreams.
Smart founders are choosing 92% of something real.
Build for freedom, not exits.
Until next time,